For individuals, frequently asked
Questions participants ask before applying
Sixteen questions, answered plainly. Where a figure or a policy is not yet fixed, that is stated here rather than guessed at, with a link to where it will be published once it is.
The mechanism
What is a real problem, and how does it differ from a capstone or simulation?
A real problem is one a partner organisation has defined itself, has already scoped, and does not currently have the internal capacity to staff. It exists because the organisation needs an answer, not because an institution wrote it to teach a case. A capstone or simulation is set by whoever is teaching the course, for pedagogical purposes, and its constraints can be relaxed if they get in the way of the lesson. A Praxora Lab problem is set by the organisation that will use the outcome, and its constraints, on data access, on confidentiality, on what a workable answer actually looks like, are not adjustable for a participant's convenience.
Who contributes the problems and how are they scoped?
Partner organisations submit problems through a structured intake that captures the domain, the problem statement, the desired outcome, the constraints and the confidentiality posture. Praxora Lab then scopes each submission before it reaches a cohort, settling what confidentiality exposure the problem carries, what access participants genuinely need, and whether a realistic outcome exists within a cohort's stated duration. A problem that cannot be scoped to a safe, time-bound piece of work is not assigned to a cohort. See how it works for the full pipeline, including how each problem is assigned a disclosure tier.
Eligibility and process
What is the time commitment per week and over the full programme?
The pilot format, the Sprint Challenge, runs 2 to 4 weeks depending on the problem assigned to a cohort. The weekly time commitment has not been fixed yet. It publishes once the first pilot cohort is confirmed. On the application you are asked to state the weekly time you can realistically sustain, and that figure is read against the specific problem a cohort is being formed around.
Is the programme compatible with full-time employment?
It is built with the working professional in mind as one of three core segments, alongside the career switcher and the recent graduate. The constraint for this group is schedule, not motivation, which is why the application asks you to state a realistic weekly commitment rather than assuming a fixed number of hours will fit everyone. Until the weekly commitment figure for the first cohort is published, judge compatibility against your own calendar and state that honestly on the application.
What are the eligibility criteria, and is prior technical experience required?
Every applicant declares a segment (career switcher, working professional or recent graduate) at the point of application, and is then assessed for fit to the specific problem a cohort is being formed around, since problems vary by domain and difficulty level. There is no published minimum credential or blanket technical prerequisite. Some problems assume more prior technical grounding than others, and fit is judged against the problem in question rather than against a fixed bar set in advance.
How is the application assessed, and what is the response time?
Applications are reviewed against the criteria above: declared segment, fit to the problem a cohort is being formed around, and stated weekly time commitment. A response-time figure has not been published yet. It is confirmed with the application process for the first pilot cohort, so you are told a timeline when you apply rather than given a figure that predates any cohort having run.
What you produce
What exactly is produced at the end, and in what form?
Each participant leaves with a portfolio artefact: a written description of the problem's scope, the constraints it was worked under, and the participant's own contribution to the outcome. It is written to be read by someone assessing whether the participant can do this kind of work, not to certify that a course was attended.
May the output be shown to prospective employers, and under what conditions?
What you may display from the artefact, and under what conditions, depends on the intellectual property position agreed with the partner that contributed the problem. That position is not yet finalised. Read the confidentiality and IP statement for the current position, and for what will govern display rights once it is settled.
Is a certificate issued?
No. No certificate, accreditation or qualification is issued at any point in a Sprint Challenge or any other Praxora Lab format. What you receive is the portfolio artefact described above: evidence of a contribution to a real, scoped problem, not a credential.
Who is the mentor, how much contact time is there, and in what form?
Each cohort works under a practitioner mentor: someone who has delivered this kind of work themselves, not someone presenting it. The mentor reviews the cohort's work against a stated quality gate at defined points in the engagement and is accountable for what the cohort produces. The mentor supervises and reviews; the mentor does not perform the work in a participant's place. The exact contact-hours cadence is confirmed with the specific cohort you are assigned to, since it depends on the problem and its duration.
What happens if the partner withdraws the problem mid-programme?
This case is specific to a model where a paying partner can withdraw a problem it contributed, and it is not covered by a standard course refund policy. The position is being drafted and will be published on the refund and cancellation policy before any fee is taken for a cohort. Check that page for the current position before you apply.
Money and outcomes
What is the fee, what is included, and is GST applicable?
No fee figure has been published yet. Fee information, including what is included and the applicable GST treatment, publishes alongside confirmed dates for the first pilot cohort, and will also be set out in the terms of participation once fixed. Fees are published in principle; none exists to quote until the first cohort is priced.
What is the refund, deferral and transfer policy?
The specific terms have not been finalised. They are being drafted, including the partner-withdrawal case addressed above, and will be published on the refund and cancellation policy before any fee is collected. No fee is taken against an unpublished policy.
Is the cohort selected, and what is the typical composition?
Yes. Cohort places are limited and admission is selective, assessed against the published criteria above rather than a hidden bar. Typical composition, meaning the mix of segments and experience levels a given cohort tends to hold, is not yet established, since no cohort has run. It will be reported once the pilot cohorts have completed.
Does Praxora Lab or the partner also pay, and what is the commercial arrangement?
Both. You pay to work on a problem through Praxora Lab, and where a partner organisation has contributed that problem, the partner also pays. Praxora Lab may receive payment from both sides of the same engagement. The two payments are not the same purchase: the partner is paying for a supervised outcome and access to a cohort's time, and you are paying for supervised access to a real problem and a mentor's review. Read how we are paid for the full arrangement.
Is there any employment or placement guarantee?
No. No employment or placement outcome is implied or guaranteed by applying, being admitted, or completing a Sprint Challenge. The artefact you leave with is evidence you present yourself; Praxora Lab does not place participants into roles.
Other audiences
Submitting a problem as a partner organisation, or considering the mentor role, has its own question set: FAQ for organisations and FAQ for mentors.